![]() No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.ĭrug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. Perhaps the transferring and turning components of the TUG help to convert this relatively simple motor task into a more complex measure that also depends on cognitive resources.Ĭopyright: All rights reserved. The BBT and the DGI do not share these beneficial properties. ![]() It does not suffer from ceiling effect limitations, is normally distributed and is apparently related to executive function. Conclusions: The TUG appears to be an appropriate tool for clinical assessment of functional mobility even in healthy older adults. The TUG times were mildly associated (p < 0.01) with digit span and verbal fluency and were related to future falls, while the BBT and the DGI were not. ![]() The BBT and the DGI were not normally distributed (p < 0.001), but the TUG was (p = 0.713). Results: The mean scores of the BBT, DGI and TUG were: 54.0 ± 2.4, 22.8 ± 1.5, 9.5 ± 1.7 s, respectively. The one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test evaluated deviations from a normal distribution and Pearson’s correlation coefficients quantified associations. The Mini-Mental State Examination, digit span and verbal fluency measured cognitive function. Methods: The TUG, DGI and BBT were assessed in 265 healthy older adults (76.4 ± 4.3 years 58.3% women) who participated in a 3-year prospective study. Objective: To evaluate psychometric properties of the TUG in healthy older adults in comparison to the Berg balance test (BBT) and the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). We speculated that its properties may be different from other performance-based tests and assessed whether cognitive function may contribute to the differences among these tests in a cohort of healthy older adults. Background: The ‘timed up and go’ test (TUG) is a simple, quick and widely used clinical performance-based measure of lower extremity function, mobility and fall risk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |